Out in the Light

"An independent, fair, and impartial judiciary is indispensable to our system of justice. The United States legal system is based upon the principle that an independent, impartial, and competent judiciary, composed of men and women of integrity, will interpret and apply the law that governs our society. Thus, the judiciary plays a central role in preserving the principles of justice and the rule of law. Inherent in all the rules contained in this Code are the precepts that judges, individually and collectively, must respect and honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to maintain and enhance confidence in the legal system." Preamble Code of Judicial Conduct

Currently Before the Court 12-22-217 to Present

Pro Se Representation N.M. R. Civ.P.Metro. Ct. 3-107
Plaintiff Filing -March 25th 22
February 22nd Official Filing Record
February 22nd 2022 -Filed Documents 

InEquality Itself

"the essence of the access claim is an interest in equality itself"

NM 7th Judicial District Clerk's Office

"To have one's effective say is to be treated as a respected, participating member of the society. An effective hearing in court is more than a chance to influence a judge's decision; it is a vivid symbol of equal citizenship."
"Writing for the Supreme Court in bounds v. smith (1977), Justice thurgood marshall spoke confidently of "the fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts." In one sense, such a right has been a traditional and noncontroversial part of our constitutional law; barring unusual circumstances, anyone can bring a lawsuit, or be heard in his or her own defense. .....""Meaningful" access to the courts, Bounds held, gave state prisoners a right to legal assistance;....................The modern constitutional law of access to the courts, in other words, is focused on the affirmative obligations of government to provide services to people who cannot afford to pay their costs. In this perspective, Justice Marshall's sweeping characterization goes far beyond the results of the decided cases."
At the conclusion of a failed Hearing to disqualify Roscoe Woods; (who represented Green Lion for 325 days before being appointed to Disctrict Judge) the third Trial was set for January 19th through January 22nd 2021 with the 2nd Day of the Trial being in Truth on Consequences. The Trial was 'scratched from the calendar' without process the week prior. No factual answer has been given by the Bench for its removal and why the Plaintiff did not advance their case during the time Green Lion was represented by Attorney Roscoe Woods at a cost of $20k.
Filed Date February 22nd 2022
"the fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts." -DENIED
Court Access Denied 2-22-22
Pages are Temporary while we work on putting all documentation, recordings and records at www.minecountry1021.com for public awareness and review.
Copyright © 2022 RGVR, LLC. All rights reserved.